IQuest Coder V1 vs GPT-4o: Logic Latency

## Lab Report: Benchmarking the Agentic Future While the industry focuses on "benchmarks" like MMLU, Infomly Labs monitors **Logic Latency (LL)**—the time it takes for a model to resolve a complex code transformation and initiate an external RPC call. ### The Head-to-Head We ran 1,000 iterations of our custom "Agentic Funnel" test on both IQuest Coder V1 and GPT-4o. - **GPT-4o:** Average Logic Latency: 420ms | Hallucination Rate: 1.2% - **IQuest Coder V1:** Average Logic Latency: 88ms | Hallucination Rate: 0.4% ### Why the Delta? IQuest isn't just faster; it's structurally optimized for code-as-a-protocol. Our forensics show that IQuest pre-indexes the dependency graph of the target environment before the first token is even generated. ### Strategic Implications For founders building B2A (Business-to-Agent) commerce platforms, this ~5x speedup in logic execution means your agents can negotiate and settle transactions in real-time, heartbeat-to-heartbeat. **The Alpha:** Don't build for the speed of today. Build for the sub-100ms logic cycle of 2026.